Per Investopedia: It refers to a mindset the place a person is detached to threat when investing resolution. They gave eg “A threat averse investor wouldn’t think about the selection to threat a $1000 loss with the potential of making a $50 acquire to be the identical as risking solely $100 to make the identical $50 acquire. Nonetheless somebody who’s threat impartial would. Given two funding alternatives the risk-neutral investor solely seems to be on the potential positive aspects of every funding and ignores the potential draw back threat.”
Going by the above rationalization, I really feel that Danger Impartial investor is kind of threat in search of as they too are pleased with excessive chance of loss. If that is the case, why have two phrases for a similar habits? What am I lacking? can somebody make clear the distinction?